cpvr

Community Leader
Original poster
Staff member
Community Leader
Messages
7,777
Reaction score
1,651
Points
168
According to a recent announcement published by Techcrunch, X (formerly Twitter) plans to sell inactive accounts as a way to boost its revenue.



However, this move comes with risks, especially for former users or those who previously used their alias on the platform. Organizations may soon be able to purchase these usernames, potentially leading to identity concerns.


What are your thoughts on this decision by X/Twitter? Do you support it, or are you against it?





X’s plan to boost revenue by selling off dormant usernames on its service is starting to shape up. According to recent changes found in X’s web application, the company is setting up a “handle inquiry” process that will allow Verified Organizations— companies and other organizations that already have a $1,000 per month X subscription — to bid on abandoned X handles. Those bids will start at $10,000 and may range to over $500,000, according to an FAQ discovered in the web app.

The updates were first spotted by reverse engineer Nima Owji, who told TechCrunch that he saw the changes to the web app go live on Wednesday. The website where organizations could acquire a handle is not yet live to the public, however.

Twitter(X) inactive accounts

The idea of making money by selling handles is something X floated before under Elon Musk’s ownership. The New York Times reported in January 2023 that the company, then still called Twitter, was considering setting up an online auction process for bidding on handles.

Musk has also long supported the idea of freeing up X’s namespace for active users, having already purged a number of inactive accounts on the service back in May 2023.

In November 2023, Forbes also reported that X was actively soliciting buyers who may be interested in acquiring unused handles, but a formal announcement was not made. X’s documentation on inactive accounts states that the company “cannot release inactive usernames at this time,” though there have been some reports of people buying usernames on X outside of an official process.

By allowing companies to officially buy their desired usernames, X could generate another revenue stream outside of subscriptions, ads, and developer access. The move could also encourage other X users to keep posting if they don’t want their handle to become dormant and then go up for sale.

x-handles-website-code.jpeg

So far, the FAQ details the answers to a handful of common questions X users may have about the process, including how to start a handle inquiry, what the sales process is like, and how the transfer will work.

As the still-nonpublic website explains, interested users will work with an automated support bot to start an inquiry about a username they want to purchase, and X will respond if the handle is available within three business days. After the handle is purchased, it will be transferred to the new owner within one or two days, or it can be moved to another account the business already owns, the FAQ states.

Discounts may also be available for those purchasing multiple handles at once, depending on the number and size of the quote, the website notes.

X was asked for comment on its plans around handles but did not respond.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ja sa bong
This is a very stupid thing to do as far as I'm concerned. Also, is there anywhere it's written in Twitter/X's TOS that a user's account name can sold after a specific time of being inactive?

I don't think so because the last time I checked, it only stated that "X requires users to log in at least once every 30 days to keep their account active. Accounts that fail to meet this requirement may be considered inactive and subject to permanent removal".

If that's the case, I think they have millions of lawsuits on their arse as quickly as possible.
 
For me,. it's not a good idea. Selling dormant usernames poses risks of identity theft, impersonation, and confusions. On the other hand, it would be unfair to the original holder of the account who may want to reclaim it back anytime later.
 
I don't think he's broke, why is he acting like someone who's out of funds? I'm asking because this one is a very controversial move.
He paid $44 billion for Twitter and still hasn’t made that money back. Twitter wasn’t even profitable when he bought it.


That’s probably why he sold it back to himself for $33 billion under his other company, xAI and that move included $12 billion in debt.



Musk’s money mostly comes from Tesla. If Tesla isn’t doing well, then neither is he, really. They’ve been trying to patch things up with old advertisers to bring in more revenue, but that’s still in progress. So now, to get Twitter back in the green, he’s trying anything he can. Even if it’s messy or flat-out wrong. Smh.


50 Cent Smh GIF
 
I haven't been active for a long time on Twitter/X but seeing this post will help me to always check online every day because I don't want to lose my account on Twitter again.